Dear
Teacher,
After reviewing your student’s
portfolios, it appears most of your students are reading with a high fluency
rate, but are lacking important comprehension skills. Being a fluent reader
doesn’t guarantee comprehension. Reading is not just about automatic word
recall. It goes deeper that just recalling words within a text. Due to the fact
that your students are reading with a high fluency rate indicates to me there has
been a strong phonics based instruction in previous years. This would explain
their ability to decode and read fluently with given a reading passage. One
thing to understand is phonics is not the main source of reading instruction,
but a component of reading. Your students will not only have to read fluently,
but be able to find meaning in their reading. This is an area to focus your reading
instruction.
It appears to me your students
need to be taught comprehension strategies. One way to begin this process is by
using “think-alouds” as a way to focus on finding meaning, develop effective
reading strategies, and most importantly teach your students to reflect on
their own reading. Another strategy your students could benefit from is the use
to employ the “check for understand” strategy. This is a visual, usually on a
check mark, that reminds students to ask the who, what, where, when, and why
after each section or paragraph in a text. This allows students to reflect on
their reading to determine if they actually understand what they read before
reading on. It’s an effective strategy that your students will benefit
from. Please try these strategies out in
your classroom, and inform me how your students reading comprehension was
impacted.
Prior to implementing these
reading comprehension strategies, I also feel it would be necessary to reevaluate
your student instructional reading level using the Fountas and Pinnell reading
assessment. My main concern is your placement of students into reading groups
based on their fluency scores. If students are able to read a text with over
95% accuracy, without evidence of comprehension, then they
do not need to be grouped into a reading level that reflects their high fluency.
Reading instruction needs to be taught at their level focusing on areas for
growth. In this case, your students are reading texts that are too difficult to
construct meaning.
Thank You,
Danielle Collins Reading Specialist
Hey Danielle,
ReplyDeleteI liked your response to this activity. For my response, I also listed “think alouds” and “check for understanding” as important strategies that children should practice to become more proficient readers. Also, reflections give students a chance to stop and think about what they just read. The point you made about the students are reading texts that are too difficult for them to understand is great. If the text was at a lower level for the students, their comprehension may improve. I did not think of using the Fountas and Pinnell reading assessment to reevaluate the reading groups.