Do you agree with Marilyn Adams (1990, p. 108) who
argued that rather than relying on context, Skillful readers of English
thoroughly process the individual letters of words in their texts. Why or why
not?
I would have to disagree with Marilyn Adams’
statement. I think
that good readers rely on context to thoroughly process words, and not just the
individual letters. Reading is much more
than just the identification of letters, especially with “skillful” readers. If
readers are focusing on individual letters, than they are taking away from the
overall meaning of the passage. The important thing to remember is reading is
about constructing meaning, and not about identifying individual letters within
the text.
The activity on pg 92 and 93 proves readers don’t just
look at the individual letters when reading. This activity provides a reading
passage which required the reader to read when the individual letters were
missing from a number of words within the passage. At first, I thought this would
be a challenging activity, but quickly found this activity was quite easy to complete.
I was able to read and construct meaning from the reading passage. During my
reading, I didn’t process the individual letters, but could recognize familiar words
or word parts from only part of the visual information available to me. According to the text, readers process words
in letter chunks, typically syllables and/or onsets and rimes. I felt this
helped me in understand the reading passage, and I was able to find word
meaning through the visual information even when the “word” itself wasn’t directly
identified.
Another point I found interesting is phonics may
play some role in reading instructions, however many of the rules that are
taught do not apply a large percentage of the time. This was fascinating to me,
as I feel schools tend to focus on phonics instruction for the younger grades. If
we teach our students to only identify letters and use phonics rules to sound
out words when reading, they are going to have a difficult time identifying
many of the words they come across (2002, p. 101). However, by providing
students with opportunities to read and practice skills students will become
more proficient over time which will help to increase reading fluency. One
thing I know as an educator, encouragement to read is a vital role in any
reading instruction.
I disagree with Adams as well. I also argued that ignoring context and spending time focusing on individual letters will take away from meaning in reading. If students are not gaining meaning- then what is the point in reading? But like you said, there is still often such a focus on phonics in the lower grades, despite the fact that the rules only work part of the time. This is an interesting fact. But I think that if we do like you say, encourage our readers, we will find ways to make them successful.
ReplyDeleteI also found that information about how phonics plays a role in our reading instruction, but the rules do not apply a large percentage of the time interesting as well. When I came upon this statement in my reading, I was very surprised. Considering how much emphasis is put on phonics in our schools today. I know that phonics does contribute to learning how to read, and reading, but it made me question if schools should begin to put their emphasis in other areas.
ReplyDelete